USPTO serial 79075941
REDBUBBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3910313Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 25, 2011
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with REDBUBBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Swanson
Mark D. Swanson Pauley Erickson & Swanson2800 W. Higgins RoadSuite 365Hoffman Estates, IL 60169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Jackets; t-shirts; aprons; [ shorts; ] pants; sports uniforms; [ cyclists' clothing, namely, jerseys and shorts; ] headbands; hoods; gloves [ ; waterproof jackets and pants ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Photo printing; framing of pictures; framing of works of art; photographic film printing; photographic image processing; photographic printing; photographic processing; printing; textile printing; T-shirt printing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Articore Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Redbubble Limited
- Other trademarks owned by RedBubble Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by RedBubble Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named REDBUBBLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |