USPTO serial 79076078
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [ Confectionery, namely, edible ices, ice candies, ice cream, ice cream desserts, fruit ice, ice cream drinks, frozen yoghurt, candy, pastilles, crystallized sugar pieces, sweetmeats, caramels, pralines, toffee, peanut brittle, fruit jellies, gum sweets, shaved ice confections, blancmanges, Italian ice, frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream; ] sweets and non-medicated lozenges, fruit flavored chewing gum; [ chocolate and chocolate goods, namely, chocolate, chocolate bars, roasted almonds coated in chocolate, chocolate chips, chocolate truffles, chocolate eggs, grated chocolate, chocolate toppings, and chocolate in the form of sheets, granules and flakes, chocolate sauce; ] sugar free chewing gums, non-medicated lozenges, fruit flavored chewing gum, sweets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 21, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |