USPTO serial 79076096
ARTECH.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTECH.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, in particular crushing machines, rotary cutting machines, granulators (machines), foil cutting machines, flake cutting machines, blade sharpening machines, grinding wheel processing machines and grinding wheel testing machines, and parts thereof | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Organizational project management in the field of recycling technology and abrasives technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Machinery installation, maintenance and repair; repair information | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical project management in the field of recycling technology and abrasives technology; construction drafting of machines for recycling technology and abrasives technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMNI Maschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BHS-Sonthofen GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARTECH.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |