Drawing for BBL

USPTO serial 79076168

BBL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3983426Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 28, 2011
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BBL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zhang, Weibo

Suite 717, 136-68 roosevelt aveFlushing, NY 11354UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Wood products for floor covering; faced plywood, laminate flooring; parquet flooring blocks; parquet floor boards; non-metal flooring tiles and panels; non-metal door panels; non-metal building materials, namely, fascia, soffits, and cellular PVC trim; non-metal building wall panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 5, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 31, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 23, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2010PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 6, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2010CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 29, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 5, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance