Drawing for XENIA

USPTO serial 79076207

XENIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XENIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, in particular pickles; jellies, jams, eggs, milk and milk products; edible oils and fats, in particular olive oil, olives and olive pulpSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Caper; fruit saucesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 29, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 18, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 18, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 5, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 5, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 17, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance