USPTO serial 79076219
OLD TOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3879274Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLD TOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLEP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON D.C., DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer, stout, lager, porter, ale | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 28, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |