USPTO serial 79076246
5 ZONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841664Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with 5 ZONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley M. Schurgin
Gordon R. Moriarty Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios LLP60 State StreetSuite 1100Boston, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely, sports footwear; boots, sandals and insoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |