Drawing for WILLPLACE

USPTO serial 79076290

WILLPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3892687Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 21, 2010
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILLPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Data-processing services; business and management advice, database managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036[ Insurance and reinsurance brokerage services; ] insurance [ brokerage, ] consultation and information in the fields of accident, fire, life, accident and health, travel, automobile, property, personal property, workers' compensation, fine art, jewelry, specie, kidnap and ransom, bloodstock, livestock, aquaculture, construction, cargo, professional liability, product recall, oil wells; insurance information and consultancySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 2, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 2, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 12, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jul 11, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 3, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 21, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2010CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2010MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2010CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2010RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Aug 11, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance