Drawing for CERAMIR

USPTO serial 79076446

CERAMIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3899347Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 4, 2011
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CERAMIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison Strickland Ricketts

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical devices, namely, odontologic products being a permanent ceramic sealing agent intended for restoratives, roots, fissures, crowns and bridgesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 11, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 9, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 24, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 21, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 22, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 22, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 20, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 3, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jan 4, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 28, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
May 12, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 12, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 25, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 4, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 4, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 26, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 26, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 26, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 24, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance