USPTO serial 79076554
CHARLESVIANCIN PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARLESVIANCIN PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Aluminium foil, also plasticised; packaging material in metal foil form | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Packaging material made of paper and/or plastic materials in the form of films, pipes, sheets, rollers, pouches, small bags and containers for household and kitchen use for storing, cooking, grilling, keeping cool and freezing; small bags of plastic for wrapping ice balls; microwave foil; labels; pens for writing on films; cooking paper; lining paper for grilling; freezing boxes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Bake-in-oven boxes; cookery moulds; fasteners and closure clamps; utensils and containers for household and cooking use (not made of precious metals, nor plated); moulds for freezing; plastic beakers; cake moulds; film unwinders, household or kitchen implements neither of precious metal, nor electrical; combs and sponges; brushes (except paintbrushes); brush-making materials; hand-operated cleaning instruments; steel wool; unworked or semi-worked glass (except building glass); porcelain; earthenware; bottles; works of art, of porcelain, terra-cotta or glass; statues or figurines (statuettes) made of porcelain, terracotta or glass; toiletry utensils or kits; dust bins; glasses (receptacles); tableware not of precious metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |