Drawing for SMART STACKING

USPTO serial 79076578

SMART STACKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3896583Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 28, 2010
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SMART STACKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mari-Elise Paul

Mari-Elise Paul McBrayer PLLC500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2400Louisville, KY 40202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Silicon chips, semi-conductors, integrated circuits and silicon wafers for micro-electronics, for flat screens, for integrated optical wave guides, for sensors, for imaging devices, and for micro-machining; semiconductor wafers for micro-electronics, for flat screens, for integrated optical wave guides for sensors, for imaging devices, and for micro-machining; silicon wafers, silicon chips, semi-conductors, integrated circuits and silicon wafers for micro-electronics, opto-electronics, photovoltaics and micro-mechanical engineering ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Processing of base materials for microelectronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics and micromechanics and all derived activities, namely, silicon wafer bonding treatment, silicon wafer thinning treatment, silicon wafer edge removal treatment, silicon wafer etching treatment and integrated circuits etching treatment of semiconductor silicon wafers for micro-electronics, opto-electronics, photovoltaics and micro-mechanical engineering; processing of wafers of microelectronic components through bonding, for stacked microelectronic structures, namely, treatment of components of silicon wafers for micro-electronics by bonding in order to form stacked micro-electronics structuresACTIVE
042[ Research and development of new products for others; research for others in the field of microelectronics; ] engineering services; technical consulting in the field of microelectronics; material testing; [ laboratory research in the field of micro-electronics ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Apr 11, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Feb 26, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Feb 26, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2022INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Sep 10, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 10, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 10, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 8, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 18, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 22, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 25, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 12, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 8, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 8, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 28, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 28, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 28, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 31, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 31, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 31, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 31, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 26, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 26, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 13, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance