Drawing for ECOPUSH

USPTO serial 79076588

ECOPUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3943055Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 2011
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOPUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Ave., Ste. 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, air conditioning installations and apparatus, freezers, pocket lamps, electric coffee machines, gas cookers and electric slow cookers, lights for vehicles, heaters and air conditioners for vehicles, air purifying apparatus and machines, taps and faucetsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 2, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 21, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 24, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 17, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 17, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 12, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 16, 2011CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 10, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance