Drawing for NAT PROTECT

USPTO serial 79076678

NAT PROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3879285Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 23, 2010
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAT PROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals as raw materials for cosmetics and the food and pharmaceutical industries, mainly comprising plant extracts; active chemical ingredients used in cosmetic formulation; mineral salts, namely, magnesium salts; plant extracts used in the manufacture of cosmetics designed to preserve cosmetics and for the antimicrobial protection thereofSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
003Soaps; perfumes; cosmetics; essential oils; odoriferous substances, namely, body sprays used as a personal deodorant and as a fragrance; cosmetics in galenic form and mainly containing plant extracts, not for medical purposes; plant and herb extracts sold as components of cosmetics for beauty and skin, body, facial, hair or nail care, in the form of capsules, tablets, ampules, yeast, powders, bars, creams or beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 1, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 9, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 13, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 13, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 23, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 7, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance