Drawing for FLUTEMAKERS GUILD OF LONDON

USPTO serial 79076764

FLUTEMAKERS GUILD OF LONDON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUTEMAKERS GUILD OF LONDON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, namely, flutesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 19, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 1, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance