USPTO serial 79076777
GIPFEL INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIPFEL INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasives, namely, skin abrasive preparations, abrasive strips, abrasive cloth and abrasive paper; amber perfume; breath freshening sprays; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; sachets for perfuming linen; scented linen water; toilet water; deodorants for personal use; perfumes; windshield cleaning liquids; perfumery; carbides of metal in the nature of abrasive preparations for domestic use in polishing metallic surfaces; blueing for laundry; cosmetic creams; skin whitening creams; after-shave lotions; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; deodorant soap; shaving soap; cakes of toilet soap; medicated soap; antiperspirant soap; soap for foot perspiration; cosmetic kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss; dentifrices; shaving preparations; non-medicated toiletries; shining preparations, namely polish; mouth washes not for medical purposes; fabric softeners for laundry use; laundry bleaching preparations; rust removing preparations; cleaning preparations; preparations for cleaning dentures; preparations for cleaning waste pipes; color-brightening chemicals for household laundry purposes, namely, laundry bleach; diamantine abrasive, namely, abrasive cloth, abrasive paste, abrasive sheets; scouring solutions; false eyelashes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; bleaching salts; stain removers; non-medicated cosmetic preparations for skin care; boot cream, namely polish; cosmetics; detergents for household use and other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes; degreasing preparations for domestic use on metallic surfaces and not for use in manufacturing processes; shampoos | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Dishes; vases; cruets; cutting boards for the kitchen; containers for household or kitchen use; heat insulated containers for beverages; thermally insulated containers for food; frying pans; stew-pans; bread baskets for domestic use; cauldrons; covers for dishes; jugs; basting spoons for kitchen use; kitchen utensils, namely, mixing spoons; bowls, namely, basins; cooking pot sets; trays for domestic purposes; cooking pots; non-electric autoclaves, namely, pressure cookers; tableware, other than knives, forks and spoons, namely, plates, tea cups; hot pots, not electrically heated; kitchen utensils, namely, kitchen tongs and pouring spouts; non-electric cooking utensils, namely, wire baskets, grills, batter dispenser; kitchen utensils, namely cake molds, ice cube molds and pastry molds; cookery molds; non-electric deep fryers; teapots; non-electric kettles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISAEV ALEKSEI YURYEVICH
- Other trademarks owned by Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennostiyu "Pravoobladatel GIPFEL"
- Other trademarks owned by ASIA ENTERPRISE COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GIPFEL INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |