USPTO serial 79076788
TIOMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3968684Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TIOMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia K. Stephenson
Cynthia K. Stephenson Posz Law Group, PLC12040 South Lakes Drive, Suite 101Reston, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal hinges and hinge bands in the nature of furniture fittings and furniture bands wholly or mainly of metal for opening and closing furniture doors, namely, [ brackets and ] hinges sold [ with and ] without integrated lamps as component parts; fittings wholly or mainly of metal, in particular furniture fittings, door fittings, and connecting fittings in the nature of joint fittings and motion elements, wholly or mainly of metal, namely, [ rollers for furniture drawer slides, ] hinges; [ metal guide rails, pull-out rails and sliding rails for furniture drawers, under floor guides for furniture drawers, wholly or mainly of metal, drive units for under floor guides for opening and closing drawers, castors and trolleys in the nature of rollers for guide rails and sliding rails for furniture drawers, wholly or mainly of metal; ] small items of metal, namely, nuts and washers; [ dowels wholly or mainly of metal, namely, connection pins and pivots; ] screws wholly or mainly of metal; [ doors and door knobs, wholly or mainly of metal; furniture drawers and furniture compartments, wholly or mainly of metal; drawer frames, wholly or mainly of metal; partitioning systems for furniture drawers and furniture compartments, wholly or mainly of metal; ] damping devices, namely, dampers for opening and closing furniture doors [ and furniture drawers ] softly for hinges [, furniture doors and furniture drawers, wholly or mainly of metal; metal furniture doors, metal furniture drawers ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Furniture fittings, not of metal, furniture hinge bands in the nature of furniture fittings and furniture hinges, sold with and without integrated lamps as component parts, not of metal or not primarily of metal; ] damping devices, namely, dampers for opening and closing furniture doors and furniture drawers softly for hinges, [ furniture doors and furniture drawers, ] not of metal or not primarily of metal; [ sideboards as furniture; cupboards for pharmacies; office furniture; ] dowels not of metal or primarily not of metal, namely, connection pins and pivots [ ; furniture doors, furniture frames; door fittings and door knobs not of metal or not primarily of metal; furniture compartments and furniture drawers; non-metal drawer frames; guide rails and pull-out rails for furniture drawers, not of metal or not primarily of metal; partitioning systems for furniture drawers and furniture compartments, included in this class, namely, furniture drawer partitions and furniture compartment partitions, cutlery drawer trays, spice drawer trays and knife drawer trays ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |