Drawing for WAVE

USPTO serial 79076850

WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Actuating devices for valves of pressurised bottlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010Aerosol containers for pharmaceutical or medical use; vaporisers for pharmaceutical or medical purposes; foam dispensers for pharmaceutical or medical purposes; hand-operated dispensers for pharmaceutical or medical productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Aerosol containers (apparatus not for medical purposes); aerosol vaporisers (apparatus not for medical purposes); liquid product dispensers (apparatus not for medical purposes); foam dispensers (apparatus not for medical purposes)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 5, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance