CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EVERCUT

USPTO serial 79076873

EVERCUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3906908Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2011
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with EVERCUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine Rittenhouse

Jeannine Rittenhouse IPHORGAN LTD.195 Arlington Heights RoadSuite 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machine blades, excluding water-jet cutting machines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008Hand-operated hand tools and implements, namely, non-electric cutlery, excluding knives for cutting cardboard [ ; side arms other than firearms, namely, hunting knives and swords; razors; scissors; shears; secateurs; blades for weapons, namely, blades for penknives, hunting knives, jack knives, pocket knives, flick knives, rescue knives, daggers and swords; blades for tools, namely, blades for stropping instruments, namely, sharpeners, shears, scissors, pizza cutters, non-electric scaling knives, engraving needles, axes, razors, handsaws, secateurs and mincing knives ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 14, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 9, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 4, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2017C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 4, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 17, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 18, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 11, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance