Drawing for ESQUISSE

USPTO serial 79076944

ESQUISSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESQUISSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Architectural design, master planning, interior design services; graphic design services; furniture design; advisory services relating to industrial design; industrial design; industrial design styling; provision of information relating to industrial designSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Landscape design servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance