USPTO serial 79077075
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD SOBELMAN
HOWARD SOBELMAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.ONE ARIZONA CENTER, 400 E. VAN BUREN ST.PHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Casting apparatus, namely, casting machines and an arrangement of moulds and patterns constituting component parts of metal casting machines; heat resistant articles for use in metal casting machines and apparatus and metal filtration apparatus, namely, filters, filter holders; casting machines and an arrangement of moulds and patterns constituting component parts of metal casting machines; refractory articles and equipment used in handling, filtration and flow control of molten metal and other molten materials comprising ingates, molten metal filters, ceramic filters, filter prints and chambers, namely, filters, filter holders, refractory filters, ceramic filters and filter prints; casting machines and an arrangement of moulds and patterns constituting component parts of metal casting machines; all of the aforementioned for use in metal casting and metal filtration machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic refractory articles, namely, refractory shaped articles containing refractory filters for use in the casting of molten metals; non-metallic refractory shapes; non-metallic articles of refractory materials for filtration of molten metal, namely, moulds and filters; ceramic filters for use in refractory moulds used in the casting of metals, ceramic filter prints for use in refractory moulds used in the casting of metals, ceramic chambers for use in refractory moulds used in the casting of metals; non-metallic ingates and outlets all used in moulds in metal casting process, namely, fitted apertures in moulds for pouring, releasing and controlling the flow of molten metal; non-metallic refractory shaped articles used in moulds in metal casting process, namely, moulds, filters, filter holders, ingates, refractory filters, ceramic filters, filter prints, vessels, basins, chambers and other holloware pieces; non-metallic moulding patterns for filters for use in refractory moulds used in the casting of metals; mortars; pre-cast refractory shapes not of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |