Drawing for LE GLAZIK

USPTO serial 79077080

LE GLAZIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3853887Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2010
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LE GLAZIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel Bldg.Scarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, coats, [ gloves, ] scarves, [ shawls, stoles, belts, neckties, pyjamas, overalls; neckties; hosiery; socks; underwear; footwear; slippers; ] headgear, namely, hats [ and caps; furs, namely, fur coats and fur jackets; beach, ski or sports footwear, namely, shoes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 20, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 7, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 6, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 26, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 28, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance