USPTO serial 79077093
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
Taihe County; Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
Taihe County; Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
Taihe County Anhui, CN
Other trademarks owned by ANHUI PROVINCE YIFAN SPICE CO., LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jianmin Zhou
Jianmin Zhou Law Offices of James Zhou17700 Castleton St, Ste 583City of Industry, CA 91748UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Hair lotions; Bath lotion; Face milk for washing; ] Mint essence in the form of essential oils; Peppermint oil for perfumery [ ; Cosmetic spicery, namely, fragrances for cosmetic use; Dentifrices; Potpourris as fragrances; Tobacco essence in the form of essential oils ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |