Drawing for V-SCREEN

USPTO serial 79077133

V-SCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3873038Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 9, 2010
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V-SCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Constance R. Lindman

CONSTANCE R. LINDMAN SMITHAMUNDSEN, LLC201 N ILLINOIS ST, S TOWER, STE 1400INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical apparatus, namely, transmissive passive optical viewer incorporating optical depth-enhancement technology adapted for use with hand-held units for playing games and electronic communications devices * (other than computers and computer hardware) *; together with a protective case specially adapted for such apparatus; * none of the aforesaid goods being electronic or electrical, or incorporating software *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 23, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 26, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 26, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 16, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 16, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 9, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 29, 2013INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 8, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jun 8, 2011PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Jun 8, 2011LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
May 27, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 17, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 17, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 17, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 17, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 17, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 7, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance