USPTO serial 79077145
Serial No. 79077145
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79077145?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 9MM American Beverage Company LLC
- Other trademarks owned by 9MM American Beverage Company LLC (50%)
- Other trademarks owned by 9MM American Beverage Company LLC (50%)
- Other trademarks owned by Steve CLAVETTE
- Other trademarks owned by Maximin HOARAU
- Other trademarks owned by Eric FARRO
- Other trademarks owned by UBITZ Gyula
- Other trademarks owned by Ubitz, Gyula (50%)
- Other trademarks owned by Phillipe PEANO
- Other trademarks owned by 9MM INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by Herendi Gábor (50%)
- Other trademarks owned by HERENDI Gábor
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |