USPTO serial 79077258
MATRIOSHKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4281084Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2013
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MATRIOSHKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Joint Stock Company MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
RU
Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
Otkritoe Aktsionernoe Obshestvo Moskovskiy Vinno-Koniachniy Zavod KiN
RU
Other trademarks owned by Otkritoe Aktsionernoe Obshestvo Moskovskiy Vinno-Koniachniy Zavod KiN
Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
RU
Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
RU
Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Aperitifs, arak; brandy; wine; piquette in the nature of wines; whiskey; vodka; gin; digesters in the nature of liqueurs and spirits; prepared alcoholic cocktails; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages except beers; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits; distilled beverages in the nature of spirits; mead; peppermint liqueurs; alcoholic bitters; rum; sake; hard cider, rice alcoholic beverages, namely, wine; alcoholic extracts; alcoholic fruit extracts; alcoholic essences | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
- Other trademarks owned by Otkritoe Aktsionernoe Obshestvo Moskovskiy Vinno-Koniachniy Zavod KiN
- Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
- Other trademarks owned by Joint Stock Company; MIDWEST ENTERPRISES M
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MATRIOSHKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 21, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |