Drawing for FLYING SQUADS

USPTO serial 79077264

FLYING SQUADS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3964433Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2011
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLYING SQUADS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Kretzschmer

Julie E. Kretzschmer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications and telecommunications equipment for use by security service providers, namely, pagers, electronic receivers, video monitors, wireless communications devices for voice, data or image transmissionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 11, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 29, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 17, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 22, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 24, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance