USPTO serial 79077300
MAMI ROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMI ROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant D. Kang
STEVEN M RABIN RABIN BERDO PC1101 14TH STREET NWSUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric vacuum cleaners; robotic vacuum cleaners, electric; electric vacuum cleaner bags; electric mixers for household purposes; electric fruit presses for household purposes; electric food grinders for household purposes; electric blenders for household purposes; electric whisks for household purposes; electric washing machines for domestic purposes; electric vacuum cleaners; electric shoe polishers; electric can openers; electric brushes being parts of machines; industrial robot machines; electric motors other than for vehicles; automatic dishwashers; electric scissors; valves other than for vehicles being parts of machines; springs other than for vehicles being parts of machines; spring buffers being parts of machines; absorbing machines for chemical processing; separators for chemical processing; washing machines for industrial purposes; rotary blowers; mufflers for motors and engines; transmission shafts other than for vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |