USPTO serial 79077473
TAILSAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3936740Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2011
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAILSAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, jackets, hats and gloves for snowboarding | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |