Drawing for SUNSITIVE

USPTO serial 79077516

SUNSITIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNSITIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Patrick SAGE

G. Patrick SAGE HUESCHEN & SAGE, PLLC107 West Michigan AvenueSeventh Floor, Kalamazoo BuildingKalamazoo, MI 49007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Photoprotection complex for use in the cosmetics industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
003Photoprotection complex used in sun care products for cosmetic useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Photoprotection complex forming part of dermo-cosmetic preparations for health and skin care for medical purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 9, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 1, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 29, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 29, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 5, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 3, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 3, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 28, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance