USPTO serial 79077548
SPIEGELAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3960679Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2011
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SPIEGELAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kufstein, AT
Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
DE
Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
DE
Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
DE
92660 Neustadt a.d. Wa, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth F. Florek
Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC552 Seventh Avenue, Suite 601NEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | glassware, [ porcelain and earthenware, ], namely, drinking glasses, mugs, bowls, plates, vases, pitchers, bottles sold empty, [ bottles for cosmetics sold empty, ] bottles for foods sold empty, [ bottles for medicines sold empty, ] decanters made of glass [, and non-electric candelabras not of precious metal; crockery, namely, plates, cups, saucers ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G.J. Riedel GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kristallglasfabrik Spiegelau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Nachtmann GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SPIEGELAU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |