USPTO serial 79077702
G-LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G-LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law23 Jonathan RdNew Canaan, CT 06840UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ballet shoes; choreography shoes; tutus; dance tops, ballet tops; tops for gymnastics, both sporting and artistic; neckerchiefs in the nature of bandanas; corselets; underclothing in the nature of corsets; underwear; girdles; body linen garments; underclothes; overalls; stuff jackets; necklets in the nature of boas; teddies being undergarments; half-boots; breeches for wear; football shoes; brassieres; collars for clothing; shoulder wraps; detachable collars for clothing; shirt yokes; veils being clothing; neckties; ascots; leggings; spats being clothing; waistcoats; singlets; hosiery; hoods for clothing; pocket squares; collar protectors; tights; lingerie bodices; bathing suits; jackets being clothing; liveries; camisoles; t-shirts; cuffs; shirt fronts; mantillas; coats; fur coats; mittens; fur stoles; ear muffs being clothing; socks; boots for sports; cloaks; jerseys being clothing; knitwear clothing in the nature of shirts, blouses, pants, skirts, dresses, vests, and sweaters; dress suits; slippers; berettas being headwear; bonnets; berets; caps being headwear; hats; top hats; stockings; shawls; skull caps; sashes for wear; skirts; petticoats; esparto shoes or sandals; aprons being clothing; gymnastic shoes; sports shoes; paper clothing; outerclothing in the nature of coats, jackets, and parkas; ready-made clothing in the nature of shirts, blouses, pants, skirts, dresses, vests, sweaters, jackets, and coats; clothing for gymnastics in the nature of leotards, tights, leg warmers, gymnastic shoes; masquerade costumes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |