Drawing for TAVAT

USPTO serial 79077716

TAVAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAVAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, sunglasses, spectacle cases, spectacle lenses, spectacle frames, spectacle chains, spectacle cordsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 23, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 18, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance