USPTO serial 79077751
OLIMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3939935Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2011
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLIMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food concentrates used as ingredients of foods essentially comprising proteins with added glucides and vitamins and mineral ingredients for sportsmen and sportswomen and for persons expending considerable physical effort | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Glucidic food concentrates, namely, concentrated glucose and carbohydrate concentrates containing vitamins and mineral ingredients for sportsmen and sportswomen and persons expending considerable physical effort | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIMP LABORATORIES SPOLKA Z OGRANICZONA ODPOWIEDZIALNOSCIA
- Other trademarks owned by OLIMP LABORATORIES Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks owned by OLIMP LABORATORIES Sp. z o.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named OLIMP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2024 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 1, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |