USPTO serial 79077769
EDITION FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4014467Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 23, 2011
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDITION FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
88630 Pfullendorf, DE
88630 Pfullendorf, DE
88630 Pfullendorf, DE
DE
DE
DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials for fitted kitchens, namely, semi-worked woods for fitted kitchens, wood veneer for fitted kitchens, laminated wood and plastic for fitted kitchens, namely, side panels, wall panels and structural parts therefor; glass for building | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, furniture made of wood, and furniture made of plastic, and furniture made of a combination of wood and plastic; furniture for kitchens, namely, kitchen cabinets, kitchen chairs, kitchen tables, kitchen work tops, kitchen shelves; furniture structural parts, namely, drawers, cupboards, side units and wall units, non-metal door handles, non-metal hinges, drawers, and plinths, namely, for fitted kitchen cabinets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household utensils, namely, knife blocks, plates, and cup holders; containers for household and kitchen use not of noble metal or plated; glasswear, pocelainware, and earthenware in the nature of splashbacks and splashguards for the purpose of preventing water from contacting an adjacent wall | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALNO AG
- Other trademarks owned by ALNO AG
- Other trademarks owned by ALNO AG
- Other trademarks owned by Neue Alno GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KMS GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Krieger Systems GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named EDITION FLY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |