Drawing for REDI LOCK

USPTO serial 79077851

REDI LOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3889368Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 14, 2010
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with REDI LOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster

William H. Brewster KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800MAILSTOP: IP DOCKETING - 22Atlanta, GA 30309-4528

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated diamond tools and disc holder for grinding and polishing, namely, [ power operated sanders, ] power operated grinders; [ power operated honers, power operated scarifiers; ] system for attaching or changing surface preparers, namely, power-operated grinding and polishing tools and interfitting holders, [ drums, ] plates [ and cups ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 22, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 22, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 22, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 22, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 2, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 11, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 14, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 19, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance