Drawing for THERMOTEC

USPTO serial 79077877

THERMOTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMOTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopaedic footwear (shoes); orthopaedic soles; supports for flat feet, arch supports for boots and shoes; boots for medical purposes; orthopaedic bandages; orthopaedic sandals and shoesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles and textile goods, not included in other classes; bed and table coversSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Footwear, sandals and slippers, and parts therefor, namely soles, buckles and heels; clothing, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance