USPTO serial 79077899
HONSEI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3903194Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2011
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with HONSEI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curt Handley, Esq.
Curt Handley, Esq. Law Office of Curt Handley19540 Buckingham Dr., Suite 1Mokena, IL 60448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk and milk based products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; freeze-dried fruits; preserved fruits and vegetables; dried meat; dried eggs; edible oils; edible fats; cream; cheese; whipped cream; sour cream; airy based beverages; dairy based spreads; jams; cooked fruits and vegetables; soups; jellies | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Powder for making cocoa, tea and coffee based beverages; powder for making cakes, namely, cake mixes; custard powder, namely, mixes in the nature of powder for making custards; pudding powder, namely, mixes in the nature of powder for making pudding; cocoa-based beverages; beverages flavorings other than essential oils; cocoa beverages with milk; cocoa-based condiments and seasoning for food and drinks; coffee; artificial coffee; unroasted coffee; coffee beverages with milk; coffee flavorings, namely, coffee based condiments and seasoning for food and drink; coffee-based beverages; ginger spice; tea; noodles; pasta; rice products, namely, rice, rice starch flour, frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of rice, rice noodles, prepared meal mixes consisting primarily of rice, rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages, rice based snack foods; cereal products prepared for human consumption, namely, processed cereal, breakfast cereal and cereal based snack foods; seasonings; sauces in the nature of condiments; spices; natural sweeteners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REVIVA MANUFACTURER PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by REVIVA MANUFACTURER PTE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by REVIVA MANUFACTURER PTE LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HONSEI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |