USPTO serial 79077942
Serial No. 79077942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3857004Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79077942?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. Schwartzmann
P.O. BOX 10931535 BERNARD, #23COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Computer software with regard to logistics for the field of warehousing and distribution, for tracking documents, packages and freight ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Professional business planning; business planning with respect to goods storage, consignment stocks and transshipment centers; business development consulting services in the field of goods storage, consignment stocks and transshipment centers; professional business consultation in connection with logistics, namely, the planning and development of goods storage | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transport services, namely, transport and delivery of goods; packaging articles for transportation; transport and storage of goods; transport, packaging, and storage of goods, namely, machines, construction materials, parcels, consumer goods. Supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, rail, ship or truck | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of goods storage, consignment stocks and transshipment centers; technical consultancy in relation to the planning and development of goods storage; development of computer software, namely, software for logistics; consultancy in the field of information technology, namely, in the field of logistics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DACHSER SE
- Other trademarks owned by Dachser GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dachser GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Dachser GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |