USPTO serial 79078028
K ARRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with K ARRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN ST., 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio speakers, audio amplifiers; loudspeaker systems; microphones; electronic products for the professional audio sector for the generation, mixing, processing and analysis of audio signals, namely, audio analyzers; electronic products for the professional audio sector for the manipulation of frequency, time and amplitude characteristics of audio signal, namely, audio processors; sound amplifiers; audio mixers, sound equalizers and crossovers, sound mixers; distribution amplifiers for audio signals; remote controls for apparatus for reproduction of sound; projectors, particularly for the entertainment industry; projection screens; illumination regulators, lighting control panels; remote controls for projectors; video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lamps whose light can be turned in all directions; light diffusers; projector lamps; light reflectors; incandescent lamps and their fittings; discharge lamps and their fittings; LED products, namely, light emitting diodes, lightning fixtures for use in display, commercial, industrial and architectural accent lighting applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K-ARRAY S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by K-ARRAY S.R.L. - UNIPERSONALE
- Other trademarks owned by H.P. SOUND EQUIPMENT S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named K ARRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |