USPTO serial 79078060
FLUXUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLUXUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes, namely, bracelets, necklaces, jewelry chains, earrings, jewelry, namely, anklets, rings, tie-pins, cufflinks; jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |