USPTO serial 79078153
PURE LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3918979Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1233 Lully, CH
CH-1233 Lully, CH
CH-1233 Lully, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PCP.O. Box 1404Alexandria, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Patrick Loubeyre
- Other trademarks owned by Patrick Loubeyre
- Other trademarks owned by Patrick Loubeyre
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named PURE LIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |