Drawing for TARGETZERO

USPTO serial 79078229

TARGETZERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3995763Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2011
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARGETZERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Musgrave

RICHARD J. MUSGRAVE Husky Injection Molding Systems, Inc.288 NORTH ROADMILTON, VT 05468UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and promotion services in the nature of organization of employee incentive environment awards to promote on the job environmental protection and conservationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Environmental advisory, scientific and technical services, namely, technical consulting and scientific research relating to technology and processes to preserve the environment from human industrial activitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 5, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 20, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 20, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 3, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Aug 3, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 18, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 1, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance