Drawing for BCM

USPTO serial 79078243

BCM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BCM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Steel alloys; German silver; alloys of common metal; steel sheets; pilings of metal; sheets and plates of metal; steel tubes; gutter pipes of metal; manifolds of metal for pipelines; frames of metal for building; components of metal for buildings; fittings of metal for building; cladding of metal for construction and building; building materials of metal; building boards of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 22, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 25, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance