USPTO serial 79078282
ROCAMED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3916202Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2011
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROCAMED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Disposable medical [ and surgical ] apparatus and instruments for single use, namely, [ biopsy instruments, surgical bougies, ] capillary drainage tubes, catheters, [ replacement parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods, drainage appliances for surgical procedures, ] drainage tubes for medical purposes, endoscopic equipment, hydrophilic guide wire to track catheters, [ lithotomical instruments, ] medical and surgical catheters, [ medical and surgical laparoscopes, medical bags sold empty,] medical guide wires to track catheters, [ replacement parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods, ] medical introducers, probes for medical purposes, tubing for use with cannulas, [ tubing for use with catheters, urethral probe syringes, urethral probes, ] medical tubing for use in urological endoscopic surgery [ and ear, nose and throat (ENT) endoscopic surgery ] ; surgical instruments for use in percutaneous kidney surgery [, endoscopic bladder surgery, endoscopic prostate surgery, endoscopic urethral surgery and ear, nose and throat (ENT) endoscopic surgery ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |