USPTO serial 79078298
DIE WASSERSTRAHLSPEZIALISTEN WATERJET TECHNIK DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4027570Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2011
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIE WASSERSTRAHLSPEZIALISTEN WATERJET TECHNIK DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used for laboratory analysis, namely, aluminum silicate; drilling muds for abrasive material treatment; chemical additives to drilling muds for abrasive material treatment; chemicals used for abrasive material treatment; phosphates for the treatment of process water; pure non-metallic silicon sold in bars; auxiliary fluids for use with abrasives in material treatment; silicates, namely, aluminum silicate, calcium silicate and zinc silicate; rare earths for jet cutting and polishing; diatomaceous earth; catalysts for use in abrasive material treatment; wolfram/silicium slurry for jet cutting and polishing; hydraulic fluids for general purposes; gases for jet cutting of materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Industrial polishing and abrasing preparations for the treatment of materials; sand for use as abrasive in sandblasting | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine parts, namely, drilling machines; lathes; compressed air guns for the extrusion of mastics; printing cylinders; milling machines; grinding machines for grinding glass; engraving machines; sandblast cleaning apparatus, namely, machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure water; hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines; metalworking machines, namely, machining centers; pumps for high pressure water jets; industrial robots; machines for cutting materials, pump control valves; valves being parts of the aforementioned goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Burnishing by abrasion; mill-working; metal treatment, namely, engraving; sawmill planing; laser engraving; providing information about metal treatment; custom engraving of metals to the order and specification of others; grinding | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Micromachining AG
- Other trademarks owned by Micromachining AG
- Other trademarks owned by Micromachining AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named DIE WASSERSTRAHLSPEZIALISTEN WATERJET TECHNIK DESIGN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |