Drawing for STEP TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79078304

STEP TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEP TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Dean

Jennifer L. Dean Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100Washington, FL 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated tools for metalworking including milling, turning, boring and drilling tools and inserts for such toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 4, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance