Drawing for ROMEO & JULIET

USPTO serial 79078409

ROMEO & JULIET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JANICE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROMEO & JULIET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical framesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 25, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 12, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance