USPTO serial 79078444
ROLLTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3936754Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2011
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |