Drawing for PARVAXOR

USPTO serial 79078446

PARVAXOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3933796Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 22, 2011
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARVAXOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca B. Lederhouse

Leslie Bertagnolli BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 East Randolph Street, Suite 5000Chicago, IL 60601-6342UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular diseasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 27, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 27, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 22, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 24, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2011FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance