USPTO serial 79078598
GIORGIO G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIORGIO G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perla M. Kuhn
PERLA M KUHN EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLPPO BOX 130FDR STATIONNEW YORK, NY 10150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, sparkling wines, brandy, liqueurs; all of the above excluding vodka and gin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Interpatent & Brands Sàrl; c/o Fiduciaire FIDINAM (Genève) S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named GIORGIO G
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |